|
GOOD AND
PROGRESSIVE PUBLIC POLICY
YIELDS R36-BILLION MULTIPLIED
CONTRIBUTION TO SA'S GDP
30 000 direct and 64
500 indirect new jobs
created
More than R500-million
spent annually with emerging
businesses
[Johannesburg,
10 November 2003] In the
past seven years, South
Africa's new casino industry
has been responsible for
R12-billion in new investment,
which means a multiplied
contribution to GDP of
more than R36-billion.
The industry has created
over 30 000 direct and
64 500 indirect new jobs,
and annually pays more
than R1.7-billion to government
in revenue.
Addressing
continental regulators
and industry directors
at the Pan-African 'Casinos.World
Africa 2003' conference
in Johannesburg this morning,
Casino Association of
South Africa (CASA) chief
executive, Derek Auret,
said today that South
Africa was held in high
respect internationally
for the way in which it
managed and controlled
its gambling industry.
"Our
late arrival into the
world of legalised gambling
allowed us to avoid the
mistakes made in other
jurisdictions, and to
incorporate into our national
gambling policy the latest
thinking in terms of regulatory
structures, legislation,
and the key priority of
safeguarding and advancing
in the public interest".
Mr Auret
noted that as recently
as 1995, there were an
estimated 150 000 illegal
gambling machines in South
Africa, paying no tax,
employing very few people
and providing a platform
for associated criminal
behaviour such as prostitution
and drug dealing. Moreover,
this vast illegal industry
was almost entirely controlled
by whites, offered players
no protection against
fraud, was readily available
to minors and totally
ignored problems associated
with compulsive and problem
gambling.
Today
this situation had been
replaced by a rigorously
and effectively regulated
legal industry with little
more than 20 000 legal
machines which had contributed
very substantially to
the public purse and which
had funded considerable
infrastructure in South
Africa's leisure and tourism
sector.
The corner
stone of gambling policy
in South Africa, he said,
was the key decision neither
to attempt to prohibit
gambling, but equally,
not to allow an open free
market.
"It
was decided that South
Africa's approach should
be one of restricting
the supply of gambling,
in an environment which
was to be tightly controlled
and closely regulated.
This also meant that government,
at the provincial level,
was able to leverage the
public interest by requiring
bidders for casino licenses
to invest heavily in non-gambling
projects, such as infrastructure,
which would secure benefits
for society as a whole.
"This
progressive approach created
a vibrant new industry
which has been responsible
for some R12 billion in
new investment, which
means a multiplied contribution
to South Africa's GDP
of more than R36 billion
in terms of accepted economic
multipliers. It has created
over 30 000 direct jobs
and 64 500 indirect new
jobs, many for first-time
workers. Last year alone,
the casino industry accounted
for over R1.7 billion
in national and provincial
taxes.
"This
public policy imperative
has resulted in the creation
of critically needed new
tourism products, such
as two major international
convention centres and
over 5 000 new hotel rooms
and other non-gaming investments
since 1996. It is important
to remember that without
the introduction of an
effectively regulated
legal gambling industry,
virtually none of this
would have occurred".
There
was clear evidence, he
said, that the casino
sector had substantially
advanced another key Government
policy objective, being
its transformation agenda
in respect of the tourism
and leisure industry.
Previously disadvantaged
shareholders enjoyed substantial
control (just over 60%
of voting shares, on average)
in the casino industry,
while these same shareholders
had, on average, a 38%
effective economic interest
in South African casinos.
On both counts, this exceeded
comparable economic sectors.
The industry's
fulfilment of its black
economic empowerment obligations
through recruiting, training,
procurement, outsourcing
and other measures was
constantly monitored -
as a legal requirement
- by the authorities,
and last year alone, business
worth some R500-million,
for example, was placed
with emerging suppliers,
contractors and service
providers.
Mr Auret
said that in respect of
social issues and the
gambling industry, South
Africa was at the forefront
of international policy
thinking.
"It
was clear from the era
of the illegal industry
that as gambling became
more accessible to urban
populations, there was
real danger that a small
minority would gamble
excessively, causing damage
to themselves and their
families in the process.
South Africa's approach
to this issue, which ultimately
resulted in the formation
of a successfully-functioning
public/private sector
partnership to address
the question of problem
gambling, is today a model
which is being replicated
in many first-world countries,
including the United Kingdom.
"This
approach found expression
in South Africa's National
Responsible Gambling Programme
(NRGP), the only one in
the world entirely funded
by the private sector,
and the only one internationally
in which treatment, research
and education are integrated
in a single initiative.
It is also the only programme
of its type in the world
which is jointly controlled
by a public-private partnership,
the SA Responsible Gambling
Trust, involving government
and the industry. This
model, and the fact that
contributions are voluntary,
yet substantial, is unique
among gambling jurisdictions
world-wide".
Evidence
of the folly of attempting
to return to prohibition,
he said, was to be found
in the continuing, albeit
much reduced, occurrence
of illegal gambling.
Just in
the second quarter of
this year, there were
nearly 2 500 gambling
machines and nine gambling
tables confiscated by
the authorities, and over
30 gambling convictions
in South African courts.
Ill-considered prohibition
would only result in an
explosion of illicit and
underground gambling such
as this.
"The
single most important
consequence of South Africa's
gambling policy and legislation
is that we have impelled
the casino industry into
a framework where it is
obliged to be a good neighbour.
As a good neighbour, we
have been a steadfast
partner in the advancement
of Government's policy
objectives, responsible
corporate citizens in
our expenditure on social
investment, and accountable
licensees in the promotion
of ethical and crime-free
gaming conduct",
he said.
|